.
Serguey Shilov
The Chronicle. Definitions of
the Megascience
Notes
on fields of W. Heisenberg's
"Physics and philosophy"
_______________________
1. Reflection of physics
In his "Physics
and philosophy" Heisenberg wrote: "The first language that emerges from
the process
of scientific clarification is in theoretical physics usually a mathematical
language, the mathematical scheme,
which allows one to predict the results of experiments. The physicists
may be satisfied when he has the mathematical scheme and knows how to use
it for the interpretation of the experiments. …
Can one speak about the atom itself? This is a problem of language
as mach as of physics. … But definitions
can be given only with the help of other concepts, and so one
will finally have to rely on some concepts that
are taken as they are, unanalyzed and undefined.
…
In theoretical physics we try to understand groups of phenomena by
introducing mathematical symbols that
can be correlated with facts, namely, with the results of measurements.
For the symbols we use names that visualize their correlation with the
measurement. Thus the symbols are attached to the language. Then the symbols
are interconnected by a rigorous system of definitions and axioms, and
finally the natural laws are expressed as equations between the symbols.
The infinite variety of solutions of these equations then corresponds to
the infinite variety of particular phenomena that are possible in this
part of nature. … Still, in process of expansion of scientific knowledge
the language also expands; new terms are introduced and the
old ones are applied in a wider field or differently from ordinary
language. Terms such as "energy",
"electricity", "entropy" are obvious examples. In this way we develop
a scientific language which may be
called a natural extension of ordinary language adapted to the added
fields of scientific knowledge. …
The only thing we know from the start is the fact that our common concepts
cannot be applied to the
structure of the atoms. … But the problems of language here are
really serious. We wish to speak in some
way about the structure of the atoms and not only about the "facts".
But we cannot speak about the atoms in ordinary language. … One may say
that the concept of complementarity introduced by Bohr into the interpretation
of quantum theory has encouraged the physicists to use an ambiguous rather
than an
unambiguous language, to use the classical concepts in a somewhat vague
manner in conformity with the principle of uncertainty, to apply alternatively
different classical concepts which would lead to contradictions
if used simultaneously. In this way one speaks about electronic orbits,
about matter waves and charge
density, about energy and momentum, etc., always conscious of the fact
that these concepts have only a
very limited range of applicability." (End of quotation.) (W. Heisenberg.
Physics and philosophy. The
revolution in modern science. New York. Harper and brothers publishers.)
It is possible to consider physical knowledge today as finally developed.
The physical foundations of the mechanics, foundations of molecular physics
and thermodynamics, electrodynamics, oscillatory and wave processes, quantum
properties of radiation, elements of quantum optics and nuclear physics,
elements of quantum statistics and quantum solid-state physics, foundations
of physics of a nucleus and elementary
particles, astrophysics, theory of entropy, - are the developed space
of self-realization of fundamental
intention of some primary knowledge called "physics". Our position
consists in the following estimation of
a present situation in physics: in all divisions of physics we deal
with "direct" physical knowledge, with representation of physical processes
in their direct form of realization, but in no way with revealing of the
reasons, bases of the present processes. The modern physics is a set of
the formally presented physical processes, while all physical knowledge
is as such only "fixing", is an expression, "trade mark", physical
process itself. To put it more certainly, in modern physics and in
any of her "knowledge" and aspects we
deal only with physical processes itself. In modern physics we do not
deal with the foundations of physics.
The problem of the foundations of physics is not on the agenda among
physicists. This question is conceived
by them as completely solved as the validity of representation of physical
processes. Any "division" of
modern physics is the presented physical process. It does contain anything
else. Modern physics as a simple
set of "divisions" of physics exists as "co-nsciousness" of absolutization
of physical process itself. Such consciousness is embodied in language
of physics. Certainly, this sort of language distinguishes his own
concepts with the form of their representation, with their language
form, but the limitation of this language as special does not allow to
comprehend the foundations, the a priori form of the language of physics.
The
genuine foundations are something essentially different than physical
representations as such which illustrate language of physics. Modern physics
is constrained by fundamental restriction of thinking, such as
interdiction of definitions of meanings an concepts used there, definitions
from the point of view of the foundations of the language of physics. The
modern physics permits itself to deal only with meanings as
reality of the process itself. Definition of concepts, used in physics,
certainly, is not a physical process, it
can not compete with concrete researches in divisions of physics, by
means of which the process of
physical knowledge is opened as such. From physicist's point of view,
definition of concepts, used in
physics,
is sort of an excess in relation to the spontaneity of physical
processes. From such point of view, concepts, used in physics, are determined
as meanings in the structure of the representation of physical processes,
and any other definition of the concepts has no serious relation to true
essence of physical knowledge, unless to the theories of methodology and
history of science having merely "bibliographic"
meaning. However, here physicists miss such "elementary" property of
knowledge as reflection. True,
rational knowledge is the so-called "indirect knowledge", the knowledge
of the reasons, foundations of
"primary knowledge", i. e. self-opening of physical process to the
researcher, self-opening which forms representation of physical process.
The set of "divisions" of modern physics is a mass of primary knowledge
stopped within its limits, the mass which is superfluous in relation to
the fundamental problems of physics. Primary knowledge of the modern physics
is more than enough for the solution of fundamental problems of physics,
i. e. general field theory (gravics), problems of time, energy, theory
of the universe. These
fundamental problems are literally overshadowed by mass of primary
knowledge. In divers divisions of
physics all necessary formal work with physical process as such is
already done. While comprehension of genesis and structure of physical
processes as the science did not begin yet. It is supposed that the
problematic of genesis and structure of physical processes is carried
out in proper representation of the
physical process in the physical and mathematical form. But we believe
that problems of the genesis and structure of physical processes, on the
one hand, and the foundations of language of physics, on another, constitute
the same knowledge. Thus, the program of the reflection of physical knowledge
consists in consecutive definition of "divisions" of physics. Such definition
should be guided by "secondary" physical knowledge - by knowledge of concepts
used in physics. Fundamental concept used in modern physics is
the concept of time, but this notion has not been comprehend until
now. The essence of concept of time in modern physics is reduced to its
meaning, to variety of its meanings. The essence of problem of modern
physics as a fundamental problem of the language of physics consists
in the problem of reflection (which is traditional for language in general),
in the problem of the gap between the sense and the meaning of
concept of time; it resides in the gap between the concept of time
as it is used in physics, i. e. remaining unrevealed, closed, on the one
hand, and meaning, importance of time in physics, on the other. The
program of the reflection of physical knowledge consists in physical
and mathematical formalization of the concept of time which will give most
powerful pulse to direct knowledge of modern physics, which
express the importance of time, which will erect new quality of physical
process as such, new quality of expressibility of the language of physics.
The modern physical knowledge reflection program considers all
set of divisions of modern physics as a "termino-logy" ("logic of term").
"Term" is understood here as the "determinant of time", that is fixation
of time as physical process of the special sort, on the one hand, and disclosing
of unique sense of physical process as the "phenomena of time", on the
other. Speaking more
clearly, for us "determinants of time" are opened as fundamental physical
"terms" in the program of the
reflection of physics - "speed", "acceleration", "pulse", "momentum",
"energy", "thermal movement ",
"activity", "fluctuation", "electrical field", "electric charge", "electric
current", "dielectric", "semi-conductor", "plasma", "magnetic field", "atom",
"induction", "oscillations", "wave", "radiation of heat", "photon", "radio-activity",
"fundamental interactions of elementary particles". Thus, the program of
the reflection of
physical knowledge re-defines physical concept of time. Time as measurement
of physical process reveals
itself by means of reflection as an unique and fundamental essence,
reason, basis, genesis and structure of that physical process. The universal
physical process reveals itself as direct process of time. Time occurs
not as atomic clock shows that (I speak only about meaning of time), the
time in itself occurs as "speed",
"acceleration", "pulse", "momentum", "energy", " thermal movement",
"activity", "fluctuation", "electrical
field", "electric charge", "electric current", "dielectric", "semi-conductor",
"plasma", "magnetic field", "atom", "induction", "oscillations", "wave",
"radiation of heat", "photon", "radio-activity", "fundamental interactions
of elementary particles". Time in its spontaneity as a fundamental reality
of physics reveals itself by all its
structure in the development of physics and that coming-to-be as "speed",
"acceleration", "pulse",
"momentum", "energy", "thermal movement", "activity", "fluctuation",
"electrical field", "electric charge",
"electric current", "dielectric", "semi-conductor", "plasma", "magnetic
field", "atom", "induction",
"oscillations", "wave", "radiation of heat", "photon", "radio-activity",
"fundamental interactions of elementary particles". Time is exactly the
"matter" of physical processes. The modern physics in each of its "divisions"
deals with time; the concrete knowledge of each division of modern
physics is a certain formalization of time,
is the essence of representation of any physical process. The program
of the reflection of modern physics consists in definition of the matter
of physical processes as time, when the result of the reflection of modern
physics becomes a megascience revealing self-definitions of time.
/
>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
|